The recent March for Life took place in Washington, D.C., on Friday, January 23, 2026, with tens of thousands of participants gathering on the National Mall for the annual rally and march.
Notice how the media either ignores the protest or labels the Pro-Life cause as “anti-abortion.” This wording is intentional. The media consistently adopts terminology aligned with Democratic messaging, framing the Pro-Life movement in adversarial terms instead of using the movement’s own life-affirming language.
Most news outlets follow style guides such as the AP Stylebook, which adopt terminology favored by Democrats, directing journalists to say “anti-abortion” rather than “Pro-Life.” The result is a subtle but powerful shift in framing that replaces the movement’s self-description with language designed to shape public perception.
