On Friday, July 17, 2026, longtime Democratic operative Jen Psaki opened her MS NOW show by repeating Chris Hayes’s comparison of President Trump’s election-integrity address to a “raving, naked person on the subway, screaming about Jesus being born in 2000.”
Psaki said the comparison “sticks in your veins.” Hayes described Trump’s address as being “in its own genre of insane,” and Psaki agreed, questioning whether they should even address Trump’s claims or simply “blow past” them.
Transcript:
Psaki:
Chris, thanks to you. I’ve now been thinking about Trump giving that speech and comparing him to a raving, naked person on the subway, screaming about Jesus being born in 2000. Did I get that right? I don’t know if I got all of the vernacular right, but that was one that, like, sticks in your veins.
Hayes:
Well, it just—it’s just a weird, such a weird setup to try to, like, refute, right? Or, like, a rebut or argue. Like, it’s—it’s so—it’s in its own genre of insane.
Psaki:
Of insane.
Hayes:
So strange.
Psaki:
You’re like. Do I say the crime stuff was completely made up, or do we just blow past that because everything else was crazy after that.
Yes, yes, I felt the same way watching it. Here we are. Hope you have a great weekend, and I’ll see you next week.
Hayes:
You too. All right.
Psaki:
Okay. So, when a president gives a big speech, like a state of the union address or a primetime address, there is always—and I have managed a lot of these processes—a team of young press aides frantically putting together press clips and tweets and summaries of news coverage just to show their bosses, including the president, of course, how widely and positively the speech was covered.
And my bet is last night’s speech proved to be a bit more challenging for the craft team over at the White House, because here’s what they had to work with.
The speech now did make the front page of The Washington Post this morning. You can see it on your screen right there, but really just barely.
And that piece focuses on the fact that Trump didn’t offer any evidence to back up his claims.”
That exchange perfectly demonstrates how the legacy media operates.
Before viewers can hear the claims, review any evidence, or examine the documents themselves, Trump is portrayed as a deranged man screaming on a subway. Once the audience is conditioned to see everything as insane, the media no longer needs to investigate.
Psaki cited The Washington Post, which said Trump had offered no evidence to support his claims.
But the White House did release evidence for the public to review: previously classified intelligence assessments and reports on vulnerabilities in voting systems, foreign access to voter data, and other election-integrity issues.
President Trump directed everyone to the documents at:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/election-integrity/
The media should present the evidence, investigate all of it, and allow Americans to reach their own conclusions.
Instead, they dismiss Trump’s election-fraud concerns as “completely made up,” call his concerns crazy and insane, conceal the evidence from their viewers, and insist there is no evidence.
Our media does not investigate or report on election fraud because its job is to protect the unsecured system to help get Democrats elected.
Check the documents yourself and decide who’s really being insane.
Watch on Rumble