This Reuters headline from 3 days ago is misleading. Reuters titled it “Trump disavows spy chief Gabbard’s take on Iran’s nuclear program,” but the article itself admits that Tulsi Gabbard clarified her stance before the strike on Iran.
The Reuters report said:
On Friday, Gabbard said in a post on the social media platform X that: “America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can’t happen, and I agree.”
She said the media has taken her March testimony “out of context” and was trying to “manufacture division.”
So why lead with a headline that distorts what she actually said?